Coaching mastery – It’s more than one rigid method
Posted 26 March 2017
- Have you ever been coached and wondered what was going on in terms of process?
- Who has been the best coach you have experienced and how did they do it ?
- What’s the difference between coaching and mentoring and why use coaching and or mentoring ?
I’ve been reflecting about coaching practice and wondered about the answers to these and other questions.
Keen to hear all your views but in the meantime here’s where I am up to.
I have been a coach for over 15 years and have helped over 200 people with their business issues. It is only in recent times that I have explicitly called myself a coach – previously it was an “under the rib cage” method. (A technical term for helping people strategically when they are stumped!)
I completed a Chartered Management Institute diploma on coaching, action learning and mentoring to evaluate just what I was doing in my business practice. I subsequently described myself as a coach. It wasn’t just the accreditation that prompted this, but the work involved in the award that enabled me to articulate what it is I do when I am facilitating action learning, coaching and mentoring.
Types of coaching
There is a plethora of types of coaching underpinned from behavioural, psychological, humanist and transpersonal approaches. My view is that successful coaching needs to be addressed at the level of complexity of human beings. I like the description of 3D coaching (Machon 2010) that describes coaching flexibility from rational analysis to intuitive creativity. So for example CBT or advice giving may be appropriate for simpler issues, but systems or whole person thinking may be needed for more complex agendas.
Process and coaching models
There are many coaching models (eg GROW) which give a step-by-step structure to the coaching process, but my experience in acquiring coaching mastery is that the best coaching is based on a focus on outcomes rather than structure. The coaching process, I find can be quite iterative, so holding tight to a step by step model can sometimes hinder the creativity needed to solve issues.
In simple terms I have an eclectic approach and use whatever works. My practice is customer focussed in an organic way and I am also constantly learning and evolving, but it is more than simply adding to the toolkit!
Coaching and mentoring –what do these terms mean ?
“When I use a word”, Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”
“The question is” said Alice, ”Whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be the master that’s all”
(Through the looking glass, Chapter 6)
So keeping it simple and not getting too hung up on semantics, like Humpty Dumpty, is my view. How I discriminate is that advice plays a stronger part in mentoring where the more experienced person can relate situations from their own career. In coaching, guidance in the form of questioning and sounding board usually plays a key role. Typically, mentors also have some experience of the mentees context, where in coaching this is not necessarily so. So being pragmatic we’ll name it whatever the client feels comfortable with.
Feedback from a client on an example of eclectic coaching/mentoring:
“I own and run a service business with over 100 staff, with my business partner of over 20 years. Tina’s advice, guidance and questioning helped me to address the difficult fundamental issues that arise in a relationship like this. She showed me the light and I am now out of the tunnel, concentrating on the good working relationship needed to get on with what matters.” – a North West Business Owner
Others views: The European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC) considers coaching and mentoring a broad church. In fact their code of ethics covers both and uses the typography coach/mentor throughout. My view is this is no bad thing and from my analysis, think for management coaching and mentoring this organisation represents the complexities of these similarities and differences well.
Performance and learning goals – the difference
There is an argument (from Gallwey 2001) that if you solely focus on performance goals you will achieve less performance wise than if you set learning goals. Gallwey talks about the interdependence of performance, learning and enjoyment as three sides of a triangle, where performance is dependent on learning and enjoyment. He views learning as “a real component of work and not a chance byproduct.” A coach can be instrumental in helping to identify learning goals.
What to do when? (simple v complex issues)
Simple issues can benefit from a bit of advice or looking and just copying what others do ie don’t go inventing new wheels (which, by the way, I think is an underused idea in real practice).
Complex issues demand a two pronged approach.
- Can I adapt others’ solutions to suit mine?
- I need to create a new solution that will suit my particular context
Knowing the difference between simple and complex issues is where a coach can help to find an appropriate method for problem solving, which in the long run can save lots of time. emc is an expert in this approach so look out for future information on this .
- be pragmatic and use what works
- focus on outcomes not coaching models
- the value of continually learning and its role for both coach and coachee
- don’t get hung up on the semantics of coaching and mentoring
What did you think? Please get in touch in whatever way you wish, as we’re always interested to hear your views.
- What did you agree with and what alternative views did you have?
- Any new ideas flowing?
- What have you learnt?